Everything I want to do is really hard.

If my life was summed up in a single sentence, that very well might be it.*
It hit home again today while I wrestled butternut logs across a stream and piled them atop a four foot bank. Because of where the storm-felled tree had grown, it was impossible to bring power equipment to bear; because I wanted to be able to mill the largest possible pieces from the trunk, it was cut in very large and heavy chunks; because I wanted it done now, I was doing it with a pulp-hook and good old-fashioned sweat.
I left the heaviest till last, and was only able to roll it. Way to heavy to lift unaided.
This was just grunt labor, and a small task. The really interesting things I want to do - build a undersea habitat  or go to the Moon - are several orders of magnitude harder.

I remember the first time I realized how hard some things are.
When I was a kid, I had a large pile of sand rather than a sandbox. It was left over from when Dad built the house, and had become mixed with an assortment of Dinky cars and bricks, which sometimes led to interesting excavation projects using the Tonka front-end loader and a flattened**  steel dump truck.
I remember sitting on this pile of sand with my mothers calculator, trying to work out the number of miles in a light year.

I was nine. I had been having some  problems lately with some devices; the atomic reactor constructed of aluminum rods and bricks wouldn't exhibit fission, a space probe constructed of stovepipe had proved pretty inert, and several iterations of a anti-gravity driven spacecraft hadn't worked. Probably a good thing, because its not a good plan for  kids to test the life-support capacity of a spaceship sealed with tar paper and scotch tape.***
Having pored over Terence Dickinson's  The Universe and Beyond, I had a pretty good idea that the Solar System was full of cold and unpleasant rocks, or hot and unpleasant rocks, or things like 'methane slush' which I couldn't picture, but suspected that it was also unpleasant. So I needed to reach another star, and Mr Dickinson told me that was the binary system α Centauri, at 4.3 light years away. I couldn't visualize a light year. Whats that in miles? I asked.
 The calculator did not have enough zeros. While I was hazy what 1.0e+/- actually meant, I knew it wasn't a answer I could use, which meant time for some pencil and paper work. I still have the sheet of loose-leaf:

186,282 X 365 X 24 X 60 X 60 = 5,874,589,152,000

 This was laboriously divided by 650 m.p.h. which for complex reasons was the fastest speed I imagined safely attainable, as I knew from various popular articles that breaking the speed of sound required complex engineering, and staying 30 m.p.h. under the 'Barrier' seemed like a safe margin.
The answer was depressing: 1,031,715 years per light year!
Thanks to Analog magazine, I suspected that there were some sort of hibernation option, but it did seem like a depressing amount of time, and it was unlikely my family would tolerate me being gone that long.

There is a certain point where childhood imagination is a mixture of science and magic; where wishing can fill in the gaps, and sheer dream-power can bridge the gulf between what-there-is  and  what-I-want. This is the gap that Calvin and Hobbes dwells in, a space self-consciously inhabited by kayfabe and cosplay.

'Imagination is too often accompanied by somewhat irregular logic' -- Benjamin Disraeli


This isn't a new idea. Even Sorenson used it in the often-quoted speech he wrote for Kennedy to deliver:

"Its hazards are hostile to us all. Its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation may never come again. (...) 
We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too."

Close, but not quite. Despite what so many infected with the military-slash-sports mindset think, the point isn't the "win". Success becomes meaningless, because at that moment another task must be started, to continue the fun. This is part of what drained the enthusiasm from the space program post-landing. The hard part was done. Going there over and over was merely difficult. No further goal was announced.

The doing is the "thing and the whole of the thing."

I may not ever get greet you from the Moon****, but I am going to have fun on the way there.



*If you needed it done in a single word, that word would be 'Difficult'.
**Neighbor had driven a truck over it. No word of a lie. You could only empty the bed by lifting the truck's front end. Easy to do because the windshield was completely gone, and the gap was crushed into the right shape for a handhold.
***Navigation also required work. Keeping track of the position of Mars in the sky by mounting a red marble to the hand of clock was a neat idea, but the clock didn't even work.
****Still torn between "Citizens of Earth!" or "Earthlings Ahoy!" as my opening salutation.

Quoth

Ran into a quote I liked. Its taken from an article against vivisection, circa 1875, but I felt it sums up the last few hundred years of Man vs Nature.

"...looking forth over a world which will then own no other sway than his, shall exult in the thought that he has made of this fair green earth, if not a heaven for man, at least a hell for animals."
---Lewis Carroll

But we are animals too...

For the Win...

Why does the Chive suffer less connection issues than news.ycombinator?
The website by and for the computer-savvy, that never has less than sixteen highly ranked articles on programming on its homepage, the site that should exhibit the stability of  a monolith is harder to consistently connect to than Neatorama.
Am I the only one who considers this ironic?

For the Poet, cynicism is a fatal disorder.

Delving the abyssmal depths

  
"You do an Internet search for potential solutions, and
you’re confronted with a series of contradictory, ill-founded
opinions: your browser has a virus; your virus has a virus; you
should be using Emacs; you should be using vi, and this is why
your marriage is loveless."
-- James Mickens

There is nothing I can say that could improve on this quotation. Dipping into the Internet to find an answer is easy. Finding an answer of value is often not. In my case, usually not, but I am almost always thrashing around in the shallow parts of the Great Pool of Knowledge. I would like to say I am resigned to this. It appears that until I write one, there is no webpage of hacking into a pre-programmed ABOV µC.
Simple search strings fail, more complex searches fail; questions are twisted and distorted in hopes of provoking a lead, until the semantic striptease proves too exhausting to continue.
At some point, trying to tease an answer out of Google is harder than figuring it out myself.
Which makes me think of the critical point in a increasingly connected network just before all points become connected. I suspect that most human creativity comes out of the moments before the network fills, when you have almost enough information, when you are almost completely connected, and it falls upon you to make the final connections yourself, and answer the unanswered.

"That is the essence of science: ask an impertinent question, and you are on the way to a pertinent answer." -- Jacob Bronowski


...Sadly, this was almost attributed to Fox Mulder.
Of course, if I had found three hundred pages of ABOV µC hacks, with the microcontroller likes of Ben Heck or Datamancer leading the pack, how interesting would I find my own explorations?

"We looked fear right in the face...and avoided direct eye contact." -- SpongeBob SquarePants

That the alternative to being drunk and raving was to drink and read web page sources had never occurred to me before.*
So I was pleasantly surprised to discover this remark in the source code of Peter Welch's http://stilldrinking.org/ :

/*

Yeah, there's some shitty code here. 
There are some things that shouldn't 
be done. I did them. Sometimes, I had
my reasons. Sometimes, I was just being 
lazy. But guess what? You're sitting
there reading the source on some guy's
blog. So fuck you.

*/

So awesome.
What makes his alcohol-fueled composition even better is his damned footnotes. So neat and tidy. I want footnotes like that, and guess what? Blogger does not have them.
Careful study  demonstrates I have  options for the massively overused  Jump Break,
  1. Numbered Lists,
  • Bullet Lists,
And Quotation.**
I can strike-through and Change the Background Color

But I can't footnote. Dammit, Blogger! I am tired of using asterisks to guide parenthetical remarks; besides, without the dagger, double-dagger, section and pilcrow, it just looks confusing.
Now granted, HTML has never adopted the footnote, and granted also that there is a local-reference-hyperlink workaround, and furthermore there is always Unicode ( U+00B6,
U+00A7, U+2020 and U+2021), but why can't I just hit a footnote button while in the Compose pane and have the machine do all the work for me?
That is the point of computers!***  Anything boring or repetitious, like say playing any MMORG to level-up or
composing cover letters to unknown strangers should be automated. Its nice to be able to open the hood to hand-correct when things go wonky, but I still like to have it distilled to 'Highlight/Press Button'.

Pierre Boulle wrote a story about a story-engine...I shouldn't bring Boulle up as the idea of a automatic story machine has occurred to a lot of writers, and I believe some self-writing blog posting machines exist (All of  Mencius Moldbug for instance). But I'm too drunk to bother researching what the hell I am talking about, and Boulle's version sticks in my mind because of the apes. No wait, that was the story that was 'turned into' Planet of the Apes which I read long before I watched. I also read the Jerry Pournelle adaption of the movie, which gives us a story turned into a movie turned into a novellette. 
Having read this far, I've totally wasted your time: I am thinking about Roald Dahl, and confused it with Boulle's man who hated automatic doors and improbable anti-aircraft guns. Dahl could never have written 'The Bridge over the River Kwai'[pretty heady stuff to read when you're 10], but he could write at a better level than 'The BFG' would suggest.[Such as Edward the Conquerer, or Skin of Nunc Dimittis]



*Usually the presented alternatives are simian.
**Invisible block-quoting. Go look at the source, if you disbelieve me.
***And porn.

New Words for Old Sensations

Nomangani  : The sensation of coming up with a really good Tarzan reference, and then realizing I know no-one familiar enough with ERB's material to get the joke.